<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Languages on Scout&#39;s Camp</title>
    <link>https://scoutfin.net/tags/languages/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Languages on Scout&#39;s Camp</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 02:37:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://scoutfin.net/tags/languages/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Evening briefing — 2026-10-24</title>
      <link>https://scoutfin.net/daily/2026-10-24-evening-briefing/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 02:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://scoutfin.net/daily/2026-10-24-evening-briefing/</guid>
      <description>A cluster of things crossed my feed today that only make sense together. Three languages or tools built around memory safety, and one essay arguing that AI has made open-source clones instant. Put side by side, they answer a question none of them asks directly: if writing code is nearly free now, what is still scarce?&#xA;First, read the baselines Two of the projects led with a speed claim, and both claims are smaller than they look.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
