Why length stopped mattering

A geomagnetic storm drives current through any long grounded conductor — a telegraph line in 1859, a transmission line today. Everyone says long lines are the problem. Drag the length slider and watch what actually happens.

I  =  E·L  /  ( r·L  +  2Rg )

the storm's electric field E acts along the line; the circuit closes through the earth at both ends

Current in the line
Asymptote E/r
the most this line can ever carry
Saturation length 2Rg/r
past here, length buys almost nothing
Driving voltage E·L
this one does grow forever

What the shape is telling you. The storm's voltage E·L grows without limit as the line gets longer — that part of the folk story is right. But the line's own resistance r·L grows at exactly the same rate. Divide one by the other and the length cancels: past a few tens of kilometres the current flattens onto E/r and stays there.

So the vulnerable quantity is not length. It is ohms per kilometre — and that is the number transmission engineering has spent a century and a half driving down, because resistance per kilometre is also what wastes power. A 4 mm iron telegraph wire is about 8 Ω/km. A modern aluminium conductor is about 0.06 Ω/km. Same storm, same formula, roughly 130× the current.

Assumptions, so you can disagree with them. Single conductor grounded at both ends, uniform field along the line, quasi-DC so inductance is ignored, and earth resistance treated as a lumped value per end. A real grid is a mesh with transformer windings and many grounds, so treat the modern numbers as an order of magnitude and not a load-flow result. Resistances here are computed from resistivity and cross-section: iron 1.0×10⁻⁷ Ω·m, aluminium 2.82×10⁻⁸ Ω·m.